Subscribe to our 

Almost everyone has experienced the process of buying a car. There are many choices - new or used, economy or luxury, RWD or AWD, manufacturer's reputation and service - the list goes on. We weigh the choice between price and longevity, cost to maintain, etc. in making our decision. The research and understanding of other's experiences, specifications and financing related to the decision can make the difference between a great experience and an expensive disappointment.

These same thoughts apply to selecting high performance elastomer seals. Elastomers are expected to have a long life cycle while providing safe and dependable service. A "lemon" breaks down, causes interruptions in our schedules and costs money to repair. Poor performing elastomers can also be poor investments, resulting in short life, leaks and unplanned downtime.

Just as automotive companies offer different product lines, so do elastomer seal manufacturers. There are low-end economy seals and expensive luxury seals, with many types in-between. Even within the same performance categories, each seal provider offers unique combinations of polymers and other ingredients (referred to as compounds). In demanding services requiring a high performance elastomer, making the correct purchase decision is often critical to the safety of people and our environment, along with providing an excellent value for the application.

Every manufacturer wants to position their products in the best possible light. Sometimes, in an effort to outperform competition, information conveyed or presented can be misleading. When choosing a high performance elastomer for a specific application, a few specific areas should be considered to help you get what you need and expect.

When purchasing a car, you would not compare the performance of an economy vehicle to a luxury sports coupe. Similarly, elastomers recommended for one service should never be compared to those not recommended for that service. In the high performance seal arena, general-purpose compounds are used for universal fluids resistance and specialty compounds for very specific situations. Comparing one compound to another is only appropriate if they are intended for similar services.


Chart 1.
This chart was recently presented by Company X:

The rating system was not identified, but assuming "1" means the best, you would probably conclude that Company X's Compound 1 is superior to their Compound 2 and their competitor's Compound 3. Using actual laboratory data and specific process conditions, the comparison would have looked like Chart 2.

Chart 2. Tested using ASTM D472, AS568 214 O-rings immersed for 672 hours. Ratings are based on the amount of volume swell: 1 = 0–10%; 2 = 10–20%; 3 = 20–30%; 4 = >30% (not recommended).

In this case, we added Company Y's Compound 4 because it was recommended for these types of service; Compound 3 was not recommended for hot water or amines. Specific fluids at specific temperatures are used rather than general families of chemicals. The conclusions from this data show Company X's Compounds 1 and 2 performed worse than reported in Chart 1. The duration of the tests (672 hours), temperatures and/or concentrations of fluids used likely made a difference in the results.

When choosing a seal for a specific application, look for swell data based on specific chemicals and temperatures. Although ASTM references 70 hours, most high performance seals are expected to run longer than a weekend, so a 672-hr duration or longer is preferable.

Although volume swell of elastomers is a popular parameter used to judge performance, there are many other aspects to consider: compression set resistance, physical properties after heat aging or exposure to the fluids, abrasion resistance, etc. The mechanical properties can and will impact performance functionality depending on your application. It's important to gather all the information pertinent to your specific needs and expectations.

Figure 1. ASTM Method D395, 204-deg C, AS-568 214 O-rings.

When considering properties based on laboratory testing, longer test durations are generally more representative of actual use. Different conclusions may be drawn if one looks at results from 70 hours versus 672 hours. Figure 1 is an example of compression set resistance measurements taken at different points in time.

If only the 70-hr data was presented, one would conclude Compound 1 is the best choice for resisting compression set. However, given the longer-term data, Compound 2 is the better choice. In summary, remember the following points when choosing a high performance elastomer seal:

• Look for test results in chemicals and at temperatures representative of your worst operating conditions.
• Make sure the tests are conducted for a time longer than a weekend (preferably greater than 500 hours).
• Make sure the method follows a known protocol, such as an ASTM method.
• Make sure you are comparing and choosing compounds targeted for your specific service.